Supervised Teaching Practice 1 - 1st Cycle

Category: Discipline
  • Sim
  • Semestral
  • Português
  • 4
  • 0
  • 26
  • 2
  • IPLUSO6857-25607
  • Supervised Teaching Practice 1 - 1st Cycle
  • 25607
  • 6857
  • Teaching in the 1st Cycle of Basic Education and Mathematics and Natural Sciences in the 2nd Cycle of Basic Education

Supervised Teaching Practice Follow-up Seminar

Category: Discipline
  • Não
  • Semestral
  • Português
  • 4
  • 0
  • 2
  • 2
  • IPLUSO6857-25606
  • Supervised Teaching Practice Follow-up Seminar
  • 25606
  • 6857
  • Teaching in the 1st Cycle of Basic Education and Mathematics and Natural Sciences in the 2nd Cycle of Basic Education

Supervised Teaching Practice 2 - 2nd Cycle

Category: Discipline
  • Sim
  • Semestral
  • Português
  • 4
  • 0
  • 28
  • 2
  • IPLUSO6857-25608
  • Supervised Teaching Practice 2 - 2nd Cycle
  • 25608
  • 6857
  • Teaching in the 1st Cycle of Basic Education and Mathematics and Natural Sciences in the 2nd Cycle of Basic Education

Art Research Methodologies

Category: Discipline
  • Não
  • Curricular unit dedicated to research methodologies in art.
  • Semestral

  • A avaliação é realizada combinando elementos de avaliação contínua (10%) e avaliação final (90%).

    A avaliação contínua compreende assiduidade (5%) e participação (5%) nas aulas.

    A avaliação final combina dois elementos:

    A) um conjunto de exercícios realizados ao longo do semestre (45%) que consistem na simulação e aplicação dos formatos propostos e praticados no meio científico (escrita de um comentário monográfico [1]; estruturação de um artigo [2]; preparação de uma conferência [3]), que demonstrem a compreensão e aplicação das ferramentas metodológicas propostas nos conteúdos da UC;

    B) a realização de um projeto de Dissertação/Trabalho de Projeto Artístico (45%), que demonstre autonomia na aplicação das ferramentas de investigação, análise de diversas fontes e pertinência na integração da investigação do estudante no contexto científico.

    O exame de recurso é constituído pela realização de um breve trabalho escrito (comentário crítico de carácter monográfico sobre um objeto proposto pelo estudante) (50%) e pela apresentação ou repetição dos exercícios feitos ao longo do semestre, caso algum destes se revele de aproveitamento insatisfatório (50%).

    São avaliadas as competências de escrita e utilização das metodologias transmitidas para a elaboração de todos os exercícios e trabalhos escritos.

    São avaliadas as competências de leitura e interpretação, pensamento crítico, organização de fontes e apresentação de diálogo com as leituras realizadas, articulação de conteúdos, estruturação do tema escolhido, e pertinência da integração dos temas trabalhados no contexto científico específico da área.

    As entregas são feitas por via moodle de acordo com o calendário estabelecido para a UC (integrada no calendário letivo), definido entre a docente e os estudantes no início do respetivo semestre.

    De acordo com o Regulamento de Avaliação da IES, é obrigatório que os estudantes cumpram com um requisito de presença mínima nas aulas para aprovação na unidade curricular. A falta de cumprimento desta exigência resulta na necessidade de prestação de exame.

     

     
  • 1. Research 1.1 Academic research and R&D units. Scholarships, applications, and funding. Institutions related to the technical and artistic aspects of an investigation Project. Models formalized and practiced in institutions. 1.2 Research in art. The discourse of artists on their production. Art theory. Case studies and examples. Social, cultural, and political aspects of the artistic context and research in art. 2. Methodologies 2.1 Research platforms (literature, publication, and bibliometrics). How to organize literature. Reading methods and note-taking. 2.2 How to structure a question. How to prepare for a conference. How to write an article. Guide and citation methods. Curriculum, portfolio, biography, descriptive memory. How to document technical processes, artistic work, exhibitions. 3. Study Plan Model and hypothesis for a Dissertation/Artistic Project Work. Elaboration of an abstract, keywords, and index. Combining literature research with technical and artistic experience.  
  • This CU aims to provide MA students with tools in the specific methodologies of research in art. It provides an understanding of research in the current scenario, its definition, methodologies, and surrounding issues (nationally and internationally), and focuses on the specific case of research in art. It intends to provide students and researchers with theoretical and practical knowledge that will give them autonomy to pursue their projects and scientific investigations with rigor. For this, tools will be provided for understanding, researching, reading, and developing critical thinking, own and effective methods of study, writing tools and construction of arguments and documents, as well as understanding of their own artistic process, and the creation of means to translate, explore, and share this process with the scientific community in a critical and relevant way.
  • Mandatory
  • The teaching methodology of this curricular unit is based on a theoretical approach, through the exposure of contents in classes, with the aid of audiovisual materials, bibliography and access to support materials previously prepared by the teacher (presentations, guides, lists, references). These materials will be delivered via the professor's institutional e-mail and later discussed in class. Practical exercises oriented towards the investigation and needs of each student will also be carried out, including the simulation of some steps necessary to carry out the MA Dissertation/Artistic Project Work: identification of a question; formulation of a title, subtitle, and keywords; writing a comment (from an object to be selected); partial simulation of an article; Dissertation/Artistic Project Work writing simulation. Time will also be reserved for face-to-face and e-mail tutorial guidance.
  • Português
  • Adams, L. S. (2018). The methodologies of art: An introduction. Routledge. Azevedo, C. e Azevedo, A. (1994). Metodologia Científica: Contributos Práticos Para a Elaboração de Trabalhos Académicos. Universidade Católica. Eco, U. (1988), Como se Faz Uma Tese em Ciências Humanas. Presença. Elkins, J. (2014), Artists with PhDs. James Elkins. Frada, J. (2005), Novo Guia Prático Para a Pesquisa, Elaboração e Apresentação de Trabalhos Científicos e Organização de Currículos. Sete Caminhos. Gauch, J. (2003), Scientific Method in Practice. Cambridge UP. Pereira, A., e Poupa, C. (2018), Como escrever uma tese, monografia ou livro científico. Sílabo. Robson, C. (2002), Real World Research. Blackwell.Eco, U. (1988), Como se Faz Uma Tese em Ciências Humanas. Presença. Sousa, G. (1988). Metodologia da Investigação, Redação e Apresentação de Trabalhos Científicos. Livraria Civilização. Yin, R.K. (2002), Applications of Case Study Research. Sage.  
  • 4
  • 0
  • 10
  • 1
  • IPLUSO7066-16082
  • Art Research Methodologies
  • 16082
  • 7066
  • Visual Artes and Digital Media

Artistic Project I

Category: Discipline
  • Não
  • .
  • Semestral

  • A avaliação é contínua e presencial e tem dois momentos de avaliação periódica e um momento de avaliação final.

    • A avaliação contínua (30%): presença e a participação dos estudantes nos debates propostos em sala de aula, na capacidade de partilhar referências e de fomentar o pensamento crítico nas discussões de turma.
    •  
    • 1º momento intercalar(10%): apresentação informal do que está a ser realizado pelo estudante no âmbito do seu projeto
    • 2º momento intercalar (20%): relatório visual e informativo que deve mostrar em que ponto de desenvolvimento se encontra o projeto artístico face aos seus objetivos de concretização, seja pela quantidade de experimentações e obra enquadradas no programa concreto de trabalho
    • Avaliaç~ão final (40%): apresentação de uma exposição dos trabalhos realizados e de um portfólio que se pode assumir como um ensaio de um catálogo dessa exposição e os materiais de comunicação que dela derivam
  • The CU includes theoretical and practical classes. The lectures focus on the definition, presentation and rationale of the artistic project, with emphasis on: - how to proceed with the thematic delimitation and formulation of a central question for a project in the field of visual arts,; - the different stages necessary for the elaboration and development of a project, taking into account the procedural specificity of each student and the different mediums in which it can be configured; - how to present a visual arts project in different situations (artist statement, project proposal for applying for grants, residencies, etc.). The practical classes, held in a studio and tutorial setting, are dedicated to the development of the project, practical experimentation and the artistic improvement of each student, under the supervision of the teachers and in dialogue/debate with classmates. At the end of the semester, students present their results with expository criteria and a portfolio.
  • General Objectives: To familiarise students with the different steps, strategies and methodologies required to prepare a project in the visual arts, from research and experimentation to the conception and realisation of an exhibition. Specific Objectives: . To realise and substantiate a theoretical-practical project in the field of visual arts, making use of the interdisciplinary approach offered by the study cycle; . Stimulate an attitude of experimentation, as well as the maturing of each student's authorial approach; . To refine the ability to articulate the issues, themes and concepts called up by artistic research, in order to consolidate a critical and selfreflective discourse that enhances it; . Structuring moments for sharing learning and oral presentation of the work developed in an encouraging environment among peers
  • Mandatory
  • The teaching methodologies are based on two models: classes for the presentation of ideas and portfolios carried out by the students and finalised with collective critical debates, and tutorial monitoring of the work carried out in the studio. The presentation classes are held at the beginning of the semester. The students share the progress of their artistic project and indicate their development intentions. The critical collective discussions at the end of these presentations continue the habit of sharing references and ideas and improve discursive capacity, curiosity about the work of their peers in a spirit of reflection and constructive dialogue
  • Português
  • BOURGEOIS, L. (2015). Louise Bourgeois: The Spiders and the Tapestries. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz ELGER, D. (2000). Donald Judd Colorist. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz ELGER, D. (2000). Gerhard Richter: Catalogue Raisonné. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz FICACCI, L. (2003). PIRANESI: Acqueforti/ Grabados/ Águas-fortes. Cologne:Tascen GOETZ, I., LENCSÉS, L., SCHOR, G., VINKEN, B. 82015). Cindy Sherman. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz JOICE, P. (1999). Hockney on Art: conversations with Paul Joice. London: Little brown KABAKOV, I., KABAKOV, E. (2005). An Alternative History of Art: Rosenthal, Kabakoc, Spivak. Bielfeld: Kerber KABAKOV, I., KABAKOV, E. (2003). Where is our place?. Milano: charta. SLAGER, H. (2015).The Pleasure Of Research. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz KUSTER, U. , SHFF, R. (2015), Peter Doig. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz DUNINGAM, E. C. (2013). A Celebration Of Light: The Art Of James Turrel. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz
  • 4
  • 0
  • 10
  • 1
  • IPLUSO7066-26046
  • Artistic Project I
  • 26046
  • 7066
  • Visual Artes and Digital Media
  1. Option I
  2. Artistic Installation I
  3. Digital Arts
  4. Illustration for Visual Communication

Page 153 of 225

English Menu

Pesquisa

Login Form